a penguin of very little brain
dangertits:

skiptripfall:

rainbowfairyprincess:

I am incredibly grateful to my parents for giving me both kinds of toys. I preferred the dolls, but at least I know that was my own honest choice.

My mom wouldn’t let me have toys. 

I still find most commentary on the sexist division of girl toys and boy toys to be rather lacking. Of course if is terrible that girls and boys are given toys that encourage them to enact stereotypical gender roles so young; this type of socialization might prime them to fill specific roles later on in life. But people are still undervaluing “girls toys,” equating them with passive frivolousness. And how sexist is that? The sentiment is that “gender neutral” toys, always verging towards “boys toys,” are constructive, educational, and worthwhile. Dolls aren’t. This is the kind of sentiment that dismisses the value of “women’s work” of care-giving later on in life.
“Boys toys” tend to be physically complex. “Girls toys” tend to be socially complex.  The complexity of the imaginary play that children often engage in with dolls is intangible and made invisible early on—because you aren’t looking.  It is so much easier for a child to say “look what I made” and get a pat on the back than to say “watch me engage.”
I played with lots of different types of toys. Sure, I liked to build things with legos. But I much preferred my dolls. And guess what? All forty or so of my beanie babies had individual personalities. They had roles, romances, they interacted with each other in complex ways. There were smaller subgroups of birds or bears. I used them to create a complete micro-society. But an adult passerby would see that pile of critters as a rather useless and excessive collection.
Understanding social complexities, the kind of play which “girls toys” encourage, is undervalued from an early age.
Let’s please stop with the “dolls are dumb” rhetoric. It isn’t helpful. It’s still sexist. The problem of gendered children’s toys won’t be fixed by allowing free access to “boys toys” for all, but by seeing the value in diverse types of play, and encouraging all children to engage in them.

dangertits:

skiptripfall:

rainbowfairyprincess:

I am incredibly grateful to my parents for giving me both kinds of toys. I preferred the dolls, but at least I know that was my own honest choice.

My mom wouldn’t let me have toys. 

I still find most commentary on the sexist division of girl toys and boy toys to be rather lacking. Of course if is terrible that girls and boys are given toys that encourage them to enact stereotypical gender roles so young; this type of socialization might prime them to fill specific roles later on in life. But people are still undervaluing “girls toys,” equating them with passive frivolousness. And how sexist is that? The sentiment is that “gender neutral” toys, always verging towards “boys toys,” are constructive, educational, and worthwhile. Dolls aren’t. This is the kind of sentiment that dismisses the value of “women’s work” of care-giving later on in life.

“Boys toys” tend to be physically complex. “Girls toys” tend to be socially complex.  The complexity of the imaginary play that children often engage in with dolls is intangible and made invisible early on—because you aren’t looking.  It is so much easier for a child to say “look what I made” and get a pat on the back than to say “watch me engage.”

I played with lots of different types of toys. Sure, I liked to build things with legos. But I much preferred my dolls. And guess what? All forty or so of my beanie babies had individual personalities. They had roles, romances, they interacted with each other in complex ways. There were smaller subgroups of birds or bears. I used them to create a complete micro-society. But an adult passerby would see that pile of critters as a rather useless and excessive collection.

Understanding social complexities, the kind of play which “girls toys” encourage, is undervalued from an early age.

Let’s please stop with the “dolls are dumb” rhetoric. It isn’t helpful. It’s still sexist. The problem of gendered children’s toys won’t be fixed by allowing free access to “boys toys” for all, but by seeing the value in diverse types of play, and encouraging all children to engage in them.

  1. formerlyknownas-delight reblogged this from even-after-all-this-time
  2. even-after-all-this-time reblogged this from luistriesliving
  3. for-serendipity reblogged this from jimthepirate
  4. semiconsciousconfessions reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  5. forsayingyes reblogged this from suddeninevitablebetrayal and added:
    I agree with that commentary that the “dolls are dumb” conversation is lacking and still somewhat sexist, but at the...
  6. dont-be-a-dick reblogged this from captkimothy
  7. captkimothy reblogged this from literarybinge and added:
    Really interesting commentary. Completely agree. I still remember the personalities of my 50+ cuddly toys and dolls and...
  8. kassimeg reblogged this from tatummillay
  9. tatummillay reblogged this from hypnotiqone
  10. kaitcant reblogged this from justmargaret
  11. cheescaeks reblogged this from i-gloriana
  12. i-gloriana reblogged this from literarybinge
  13. literarybinge reblogged this from i-gloriana and added:
    very interesting!
  14. fatherwasnotatapestry reblogged this from alidiabin
  15. withlovethelavendermenace reblogged this from commie-pinko-liberal
  16. tmmlh reblogged this from hypnotiqone
  17. trulysophisticat reblogged this from commie-pinko-liberal
  18. visigoths reblogged this from isaia
  19. alidiabin reblogged this from republicoflabia
  20. tallpawl reblogged this from rainbowfairyprincess
  21. jimthepirate reblogged this from blogwoodtree
  22. blogwoodtree reblogged this from womancave and added:
    film school rant: just because I haven’t used a wrench to remove the wheels off a camera dolly before doesn’t mean I...
  23. sadhappysucker reblogged this from mutualassureddistraction
  24. m1tch1smo reblogged this from mutualassureddistraction
  25. udaishinta reblogged this from wild-asthewind and added:
    THIS RIGHT HERE!!!!
  26. wild-asthewind reblogged this from mutualassureddistraction
  27. mutualassureddistraction reblogged this from commie-pinko-liberal
  28. justamuddle reblogged this from agentive and added:
    Love the commentary. Though, to be fair to the SMBC folks: playing with “physically complex boy toys” probably will make...
  29. agentive reblogged this from suddeninevitablebetrayal